<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: TDD &amp; DbC @ DotRT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codeagle.com/blog/2009/05/09/tdd-dbc-dotrttdd-dbc-dotrt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codeagle.com/blog/nl/2009/05/09/tdd-dbc-dotrttdd-dbc-dotrt/</link>
	<description>Rick&#039;s personal and professional blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:47:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.codeagle.com/blog/nl/2009/05/09/tdd-dbc-dotrttdd-dbc-dotrt/comment-page-1/#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeagle.com/blog/?p=245#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>Nice quote. :-) 

I read your article and had a look at the test framework. For data-driven unit tests I can see this go a long way. 

By the way, I have been doing TDD in a statically typed language for a while now and it is quite acceptable to me, I must say. There is just a short while in which it doesn&#039;t compile. And you cannot use IntelliSense. But that&#039;s a very short time. Of course, SmallTalk is ideally suited for TDD, but most of the pro&#039;s translate to other languages as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice quote. <img src='http://www.codeagle.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I read your article and had a look at the test framework. For data-driven unit tests I can see this go a long way. </p>
<p>By the way, I have been doing TDD in a statically typed language for a while now and it is quite acceptable to me, I must say. There is just a short while in which it doesn&#8217;t compile. And you cannot use IntelliSense. But that&#8217;s a very short time. Of course, SmallTalk is ideally suited for TDD, but most of the pro&#8217;s translate to other languages as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: André Boonzaaijer</title>
		<link>http://www.codeagle.com/blog/nl/2009/05/09/tdd-dbc-dotrttdd-dbc-dotrt/comment-page-1/#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator>André Boonzaaijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 07:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeagle.com/blog/?p=245#comment-2896</guid>
		<description>Oh yes and of course my own opinion on this matter: http://whiletrue.nl/blog/?p=93 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes and of course my own opinion on this matter: <a href="http://whiletrue.nl/blog/?p=93" rel="nofollow">http://whiletrue.nl/blog/?p=93</a> <img src='http://www.codeagle.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: André Boonzaaijer</title>
		<link>http://www.codeagle.com/blog/nl/2009/05/09/tdd-dbc-dotrttdd-dbc-dotrt/comment-page-1/#comment-2895</link>
		<dc:creator>André Boonzaaijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 07:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codeagle.com/blog/?p=245#comment-2895</guid>
		<description>Even the notorious Donald Knuth winked to provable correct code. A famous quote states:

&quot;Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the notorious Donald Knuth winked to provable correct code. A famous quote states:</p>
<p>&#8220;Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

